It is my opinion that in the off-season following the 2006 season the SF Giants were generally perceived around the league as a team which talked about rebuilding but was not rebuilding; as a club where mediocre management was ensconced; where aging and past their prime veteran players were overpaid and given preferential playing time; where the priority was not winning but only being good enough to attract paying customers. Scrutinizing the last half decade of the Giants performance shows that this perception was accurate.
June 24th, 2011 at 8:28 am
It is my opinion that in the off-season following the 2006 season the SF Giants were generally perceived around the league as a team which talked about rebuilding but was not rebuilding; as a club where mediocre management was ensconced; where aging and past their prime veteran players were overpaid and given preferential playing time; where the priority was not winning but only being good enough to attract paying customers. Scrutinizing the last half decade of the Giants performance shows that this perception was accurate.